Michael Kennedy v. Judge Chief, et al
| UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, CHIEF JUDGE and ALL UNITED STATES JUDGES FOR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT |
| MICHAEL KENNEDY |
| 19-20051 |
| January 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeals pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to comply with the Court's notice of 01/28/2019 [19-20051] (ABT) [Entered: 02/28/2019 12:58 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion to Recusal the Chief Judge and all Judges of the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals received from Appellant Mr. Michael Kennedy in light of the clerk's1/28/19 notice advising the until the monetary sanctions imposed have been paid, we would not address nor acknowledge forthcoming subnissions that did not contain proof of payment of the monetary sanctions imposed. [19-20051] (DLM) [Entered: 02/07/2019 02:00 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8970562-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 02/27/2019 for Appellant Michael Kennedy [19-20051] (ABT) [Entered: 01/28/2019 02:14 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [8967538-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Kennedy. [8967538-1] [19-20051] (CAG) [Entered: 01/23/2019 03:43 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Kennedy [19-20051] (CAG) [Entered: 01/23/2019 01:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
