USA v. Jesus Olguin-Netro
| JESUS ALBERTO OLGUIN-NETRO |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-20097 |
| February 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant USA. Extension Granted to and including 05/15/2019. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 05/15/2019 for Appellant United States of America [19-20097] (CAS) [Entered: 04/09/2019 04:08 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant USA for filing United States Opening Brief until 05/15/2019 [19-20097] (Audrey Lynn Maness ) [Entered: 04/09/2019 03:32 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20097] (DDL) [Entered: 03/04/2019 07:27 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/15/2019 for Appellant United States of America. [19-20097] (DDL) [Entered: 03/04/2019 07:27 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CR-708-1. Electronic ROA due on 03/12/2019. [19-20097] (DMS) [Entered: 02/25/2019 11:17 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-20097] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant USA advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 02/22/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Maness, Mitchell; Attorney for Appellees: Meyers, Sokolow [19-20097] (Audrey Lynn Maness ) [Entered: 02/22/2019 03:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Audrey Lynn Maness for party(s) Appellant USA, in case 19-20097 [19-20097] (DMS) [Entered: 02/22/2019 08:43 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) H. Michael Sokolow for party(s) Appellee Jesus Alberto Olguin-Netro, in case 19-20097 [19-20097] (DMS) [Entered: 02/22/2019 08:38 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20097] (H. Michael Sokolow ) [Entered: 02/21/2019 08:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20097] (Audrey Lynn Maness ) [Entered: 02/21/2019 03:52 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8988060-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 03/07/2019 for Appellant United States of America [19-20097] (CCR) [Entered: 02/20/2019 11:40 AM] |
| NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant USA [19-20097] (CCR) [Entered: 02/13/2019 02:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Jesus Olguin-Netro | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JESUS ALBERTO OLGUIN-NETRO | |
| Represented By: | H. Michael Sokolow |
| Represented By: | Marjorie A. Meyers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Audrey Lynn Maness |
| Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
