Janna Russell v. David Russell, et al
DAVID C. RUSSELL and RONALD J. SOMMERS, Chapter 7 Trustee |
JANNA F. RUSSELL |
19-20180 |
March 21, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Janna Russell v. David Russell, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Ms. Janna F. Russell. Extension Granted to and including 06/03/2019. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 06/03/2019 for Appellant Janna F. Russell [19-20180] (CAG) [Entered: 05/13/2019 01:10 PM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Ms. Janna F. Russell for filing Appellant's Brief until 06/03/2019 [19-20180] (H. Miles Cohn ) [Entered: 05/13/2019 12:53 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Marc Douglas Myers for Appellee Ronald J. Sommers in 19-20180 [19-20180] (CAS) [Entered: 04/23/2019 11:54 AM] |
Attorney Marc Douglas Myers is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The appearance form must be filed electronically. [19-20180] (LBM) [Entered: 04/18/2019 12:55 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20180] (Marc Douglas Myers ) [Entered: 04/18/2019 01:15 PM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Appellee Ronald J. Sommers added to case. Reason: DC added Ronald J. Sommers as appellee. [19-20180] (CCR) [Entered: 04/23/2019 08:59 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Joan K. Kehlhof for Appellee David C. Russell in 19-20180 [19-20180] (CB) [Entered: 04/15/2019 12:54 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Sirigumukh Singh Khalsa for Appellee David C. Russell in 19-20180 [19-20180] (CB) [Entered: 04/15/2019 12:56 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20180] (Sirigumukh Singh Khalsa ) [Entered: 04/12/2019 04:41 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20180] (Joan K. Kehlhof ) [Entered: 04/12/2019 04:26 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney H. Miles Cohn for Appellant Janna F. Russell in 19-20180 [19-20180] (CAG) [Entered: 04/09/2019 03:16 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary - no hearings. [19-20180] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Janna F. Russell advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 04/08/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cohn; Attorney for Appellees: Kehlhof, Khalsa; US mail - Attorney for Appellees: Miller, White [19-20180] (H. Miles Cohn ) [Entered: 04/08/2019 10:57 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20180] (H. Miles Cohn ) [Entered: 04/08/2019 10:44 AM] |
Attorney Mr. H. Miles Cohn, Esq. for Appellant Ms. Janna F. Russell is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: No signature on appearance form. [19-20180] (BPL) [Entered: 04/04/2019 09:46 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20180] (DDL) [Entered: 04/03/2019 11:03 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/13/2019 for Appellant Janna F. Russell. [19-20180] (DDL) [Entered: 04/03/2019 11:04 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20180] (H. Miles Cohn ) [Entered: 04/03/2019 05:06 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9015967-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-20180] (CCR) [Entered: 03/28/2019 09:58 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CV-1971. Electronic ROA due on 04/12/2019. [19-20180] (CCR) [Entered: 03/28/2019 10:04 AM] |
BANKRUPTCY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Janna F. Russell [19-20180] (CCR) [Entered: 03/21/2019 02:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.