Raymond Lumsden v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
RONALD GIVENS, Warden, in both his individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE, Major Robinson, in both his individual and official capacity, MARK HARRIS, Warden, in both his individual and official capacity, JOHN DOE, Major Castillo, in both his individual and official capacity and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
RAYMOND LUMSDEN, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarily situated and RAYMOND LUMSDEN, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated |
19-20183 |
March 22, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Raymond Lumsden v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEFING COMPLETE. [19-20183] (DLM) [Entered: 05/02/2019 10:43 AM] |
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Raymond Lumsden. # of Copies Provided: 4 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied [19-20183] (DLM) [Entered: 05/02/2019 09:45 AM] |
LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Lumsden referencing the filing of Appellant's premature Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Lumsden in 19-20183 [ # 9043097-2 ]. [19-20183] (DLM) [Entered: 05/02/2019 09:46 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 05/28/2019 for Appellant Raymond Lumsden. [19-20183] (DLM) [Entered: 04/17/2019 03:36 PM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/15/2019 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Raymond Lumsden. Initial partial filing fee assessed.Fee deadline satisfied [19-20183] (DLM) [Entered: 04/17/2019 03:34 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9031286-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-20183] (RLL) [Entered: 04/17/2019 09:13 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Lumsden to appoint counsel [9031969-2]. Date of service: 03/12/2019 [19-20183] (DLM) [Entered: 04/17/2019 03:31 PM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant's Brief received from Appellant Mr. Raymond Lumsden because it was received prematurely (advised in DKT 6 ntc.) [19-20183] (DLM) [Entered: 04/17/2019 04:19 PM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9027525-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Lumsden. [9027525-1] [19-20183] (AS) [Entered: 04/11/2019 02:07 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9018264-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 05/28/2019 for Appellant Raymond Lumsden [19-20183] (ABT) [Entered: 04/01/2019 10:45 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Lumsden [19-20183] (AS) [Entered: 03/22/2019 12:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Raymond Lumsden v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: RONALD GIVENS, Warden, in both his individual and official capacity | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: JOHN DOE, Major Robinson, in both his individual and official capacity | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: MARK HARRIS, Warden, in both his individual and official capacity | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: JOHN DOE, Major Castillo, in both his individual and official capacity | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: RAYMOND LUMSDEN, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarily situated | |
Represented By: | Raymond Lumsden |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: RAYMOND LUMSDEN, on his own behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated | |
Represented By: | Raymond Lumsden |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.