Gregory Carraway v. Bryan Collier, Executive Dir, et al
| GREGORY CARRAWAY |
| BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
| 19-20195 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20195] (Craig William Cosper ) [Entered: 05/02/2019 06:42 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Craig William Cosper for party(s) Appellee Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, in case 19-20195 [19-20195] (JMW) [Entered: 05/02/2019 02:01 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Gregory Carraway [ # 9039533-2 ] Motion due deadline updated to 06/12/2019 for Appellant Gregory Carraway. Brief in Support deadline updated to 06/12/2019 for Appellant Gregory Carraway [19-20195] (MRW) [Entered: 04/29/2019 01:56 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Gregory Carraway to extend time to comply with COA requirements until 06/12/2019 [9039533-2]. Date of service: 04/22/2019 [19-20195] (MRW) [Entered: 04/29/2019 01:53 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20195] (DDL) [Entered: 04/10/2019 03:12 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9019269-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Motion due on 05/13/2019 for Appellant Gregory Carraway. Brief in Support due on 05/13/2019 for Appellant Gregory Carraway [19-20195] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/02/2019 08:30 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:17-CV-3440. Electronic ROA due on 04/17/2019. [19-20195] (WMJ) [Entered: 04/02/2019 08:36 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gregory Carraway [19-20195] (WMJ) [Entered: 03/27/2019 02:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gregory Carraway v. Bryan Collier, Executive Dir, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: GREGORY CARRAWAY | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Carraway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Represented By: | Craig William Cosper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
| Represented By: | Adham Ramzi Bissar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
