Anthony Ortiz v. Lorie Davis, et al
| COV SHARON M. BONIABY, ASSISTANT WARDEN DONALD J. BILNOSKI, WARDEN ROBERT D. HERRERA, LIEUTENANT CLARENCE HOUSTON, LORIE DAVIS and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| ANTHONY ORTIZ |
| 19-20212 |
| April 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Anthony Ortiz v. Lorie Davis, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20212] (ABT) [Entered: 05/29/2019 08:15 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:16-CV-3555. Electronic ROA due on 05/28/2019. [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 05/13/2019 10:09 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9050895-2] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 05/03/2019 [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 05/13/2019 10:05 AM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9050895-2 ]. Date of Service: 05/03/2019. [9050900-1] [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 05/13/2019 10:08 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz [ # 9047048-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 05/20/2019 for Appellant Anthony Ortiz [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:01 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Request for a DKT 13 Transcript Form received from Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz because there is no transcript required for this appeal. He should refer to the court's previous notice issued on 4/30/19 regarding the processing of this appeal [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 05/08/2019 11:04 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz to extend time to pay filing fee until 05/20/2019 [9047048-2]. Date of service: 05/02/2019 [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 05/07/2019 02:00 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion for Extension of Time to Order Transcripts received from Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz because transcripts are no required for appeal purposes (advised in BR 9 ntc.) [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 04/30/2019 09:53 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Problem of Three Strikes which appears to be a motion for IFP under a claim of imminent danger, and the cover letter asking to dismiss the copy system received from Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz. On 4/9/19 notice was issued directing payment of the fee or a motion for IFP based solely on the reasons why he disagreed with the district court's no good faith certification. Neither document represents the required filing and no action will be taken. Also addressing the Declaration for Entry of Default Judgement and Extension to Order Transcripts received under separate cover. [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 04/30/2019 09:03 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Declaration for Entry Default Judgement received from Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz. Because the appellees were not represented in the district court, no responses were filed, nor will be filed. He will be required to brief the issue(s) on appeal once the filing fee is resolved. (advised in BR 9 ntc.) [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 04/29/2019 03:07 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the two separate Appeal Briefs sent to the district court and forwarded to this court for processing received from Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz because As previously advised on 4/19/19, a brief on the merits is premature and cannot be filed at this time. If either of these briefs represent an attempt to comply with the court's 4/9/19 notice regarding the filing fee, a motion for IFP together with a trust statement will be necessary. [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 04/25/2019 01:36 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant's Brief received from Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz because it is premature [19-20212] (DLM) [Entered: 04/19/2019 04:24 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/05/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. [19-20212] (CBW) [Entered: 04/09/2019 01:54 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9025570-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due or motion for IFP in 5CCA on 05/09/2019 for Appellant Anthony Ortiz [19-20212] (CBW) [Entered: 04/09/2019 01:58 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony Ortiz [19-20212] (CBW) [Entered: 04/05/2019 10:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
