James Meeks, III v. Lorie Davis, et al
Defendant / Appellee: STATE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, LORIE DAVIS and WARDEN G. VAUGHN
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES A. MEEKS, III
Case Number: 19-20257
Filed: April 18, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 26, 2019 James Meeks, III v. Lorie Davis, et al

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2019 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20257] (PAC) [Entered: 06/07/2019 12:15 PM]
June 3, 2019 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CV-3431. Electronic ROA due on 06/18/2019. [19-20257] (DMS) [Entered: 06/03/2019 12:23 PM]
June 3, 2019 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 07/15/2019 for Appellant James A. Meeks III. [19-20257] (DLM) [Entered: 06/03/2019 02:18 PM]
May 31, 2019 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant's brief received from Appellant James A. Meeks, III because it was received prior to issuance of the briefing notice. [19-20257] (DLM) [Entered: 06/03/2019 02:17 PM]
May 13, 2019 MOTION filed by Appellant James A. Meeks, III to appoint counsel [9053340-2]. Date of service: 05/08/2019 [19-20257] (DLM) [Entered: 05/15/2019 11:29 AM]
May 13, 2019 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/03/2019 denying motion to appoint counsel and to extend appellate deadlines [19-20257] (DLM) [Entered: 05/15/2019 11:27 AM]
May 1, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9042275-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-20257] (mtn appt csl pn) (CCR) [Entered: 05/01/2019 01:09 PM]
May 1, 2019 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/25/2019 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant James A. Meeks, III. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [19-20257] (CCR) [Entered: 05/01/2019 03:09 PM]
April 18, 2019 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant James A. Meeks, III [19-20257] (CCR) [Entered: 04/18/2019 02:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Meeks, III v. Lorie Davis, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LORIE DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WARDEN G. VAUGHN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JAMES A. MEEKS, III
Represented By: James A. Meeks III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?