Lawrence Higgins v. Richard Morris, et al
DELETA JONES, Captain, RICHARD MORRIS, Warden, Correctional Institutions Division Ellis Unit and ERNEST NAVARRETE, Major |
LAWRENCE HIGGINS |
19-20351 |
May 21, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
The Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA filed by Appellant Mr. Lawrence Higgins in 19-20351 [ # 9087538-2 ] has been made sufficient. [19-20351] (DLM) [Entered: 07/15/2019 10:51 AM] |
BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Lawrence Higgins in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA (INCORPORATED WITHIN MOTION FOR IFP) [ # 9087538-2 ]. [9097186-1] [19-20351] (DLM) [Entered: 07/15/2019 10:54 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Lawrence Higgins to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9087538-2] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 07/11/2019 for Appellant Lawrence Higgins. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs trust fund statement [19-20351] (DLM) [Entered: 07/01/2019 10:22 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/10/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Lawrence Higgins because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due on 07/22/2019 for Appellant Lawrence Higgins [19-20351] (ABT) [Entered: 06/21/2019 10:41 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9061506-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [19-20351] (CSG) [Entered: 05/28/2019 08:42 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Lawrence Higgins [19-20351] (CSG) [Entered: 05/21/2019 09:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.