Sojitz Energy Venture, Inc. v. Union Oil Company of CA
| UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA |
| SOJITZ ENERGY VENTURE, INCORPORATED |
| 19-20581 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Union Oil Company of California. Extension Granted to and including 11/01/2019. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 11/01/2019 for Appellant Union Oil Company of California [19-20581] (DMS) [Entered: 09/11/2019 03:10 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Union Oil Company of California for filing Opening Brief until 11/01/2019 [19-20581] (Aaron Michael Streett ) [Entered: 09/11/2019 02:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Meghan McElvy for party(s) Appellant Union Oil Company of California, in case 19-20581 [19-20581] (ABT) [Entered: 08/30/2019 08:41 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20581] (Meghan McElvy ) [Entered: 08/29/2019 11:57 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jonathan Mark Little for Appellant Union Oil Company of California in 19-20581, by Attorney(s) Aaron Michael Streett, Ioannis Vasilios Anaipakos, Travis Lenti Gray for party(s) Appellant Union Oil Company of California, in case 19-20581 [19-20581] (ABT) [Entered: 08/29/2019 07:12 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jonathan Mark Little for Union Oil Company of California for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20581] (Jonathan Mark Little ) [Entered: 08/28/2019 02:36 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20581] (Travis Lenti Gray ) [Entered: 08/28/2019 03:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20581] (Aaron Michael Streett ) [Entered: 08/28/2019 02:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20581] (Ioannis Vasilios Anaipakos ) [Entered: 08/28/2019 02:24 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20581] (DDL) [Entered: 08/23/2019 04:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Dill Mitchell McFarland for Appellee Sojitz Energy Venture, Incorporated in 19-20581 [19-20581] (ABT) [Entered: 08/23/2019 08:15 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/02/2019 for Appellant Union Oil Company of California. [19-20581] (DDL) [Entered: 08/23/2019 04:21 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9127637-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-20581] (CCR) [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:39 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:17-CV-2941. Electronic ROA due on 09/06/2019. [19-20581] (CCR) [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:41 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Dill Mitchell McFarland for Sojitz Energy Venture, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20581] (Dill Mitchell McFarland ) [Entered: 08/22/2019 02:08 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Union Oil Company of California advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [19-20581] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Union Oil Company of California advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 08/20/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Little; Attorney for Appellee: McFarland [19-20581] (Jonathan Mark Little ) [Entered: 08/20/2019 03:34 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Union Oil Company of California [19-20581] (CCR) [Entered: 08/19/2019 11:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
