Frank Butler, et al v. Colonial Savings, F.A.
| COLONIAL SAVINGS |
| FRANK BUTLER and LASHANDA BUTLER |
| 19-20630 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to file appellant's brief and record excerpts [9183569-2] [19-20630] (CAG) [Entered: 11/05/2019 03:35 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/28/2019 for Appellants Frank Butler and Lashanda Butler. [19-20630] (DDL) [Entered: 09/18/2019 12:54 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Mark Douglas Cronenwett for party(s) Appellee Colonial Savings, in case 19-20630 [19-20630] (ABT) [Entered: 09/18/2019 01:13 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20630] (DDL) [Entered: 09/18/2019 12:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20630] (Mark Douglas Cronenwett ) [Entered: 09/17/2019 05:55 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9144410-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-20630] (CAG) [Entered: 09/13/2019 01:53 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CV-2491. Electronic ROA due on 09/30/2019. [19-20630] (CAG) [Entered: 09/13/2019 02:01 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Frank Butler and Ms. Lashanda Butler [19-20630] (DMS) [Entered: 09/09/2019 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
