Yazid Bey v. George Bamberg, Jr.
| YAZID MALIK BEY |
| GEORGE W. BAMBERG, JR. |
| 19-20641 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal as erroneously docketed [9148886-2] [19-20641] (ABT) [Entered: 09/19/2019 03:32 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Returned for Case Management Purposes [9148878-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-20641] (ABT) [Entered: 09/19/2019 03:30 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Yazid Malik Bey [19-20641] (CAS) [Entered: 09/11/2019 01:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Yazid Bey v. George Bamberg, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: YAZID MALIK BEY | |
| Represented By: | Yazid Malik Bey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: GEORGE W. BAMBERG, JR. | |
| Represented By: | James Dean Salyer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
