Raymond Daniels v. Lorie Davis, et al
Defendant / Appellee: HARRIS COUNTY JAIL, HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BREANNA SCHWARTZ, HARRIS S. WOOD, JR., DONNA WRIGHT, PASADENA POLICE DEPARTMENT and LORIE DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAYMOND JOHN DANIELS
Case Number: 19-20642
Filed: September 11, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2019 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/28/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Raymond John Daniels because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due on 12/05/2019 for Appellant Raymond John Daniels [19-20642] (ABT) [Entered: 11/05/2019 01:14 PM]
October 22, 2019 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion for Judgement to Correct Clerical Mistakes which appears to refer to the merits of the appeal received from Appellant Mr. Raymond John Daniels. The only place for argument to support the merits of the appeal is its inclusion in an appellant's brief, once requested for filing [19-20642] (DLM) [Entered: 10/23/2019 02:40 PM]
October 22, 2019 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the 10/15/19 Correspondence asking for an extension and copies of judgment orders entered in this appeal received from Appellant Mr. Raymond John Daniels because there is no need for an extension at this time and no rulings have been entered in this appeal. He should await instructions from this court for the next step necessary in processing this appeal [19-20642] (DLM) [Entered: 10/23/2019 03:05 PM]
October 8, 2019 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the First Motion for Extension of Time to Appeal received from Appellant Mr. Raymond John Daniels because the motion is premature. IFP is pending in the district court. Once dc enters a ruling, we will send you notice of the next step for processing the appeal [19-20642] (MRW) [Entered: 10/09/2019 09:39 AM]
October 2, 2019 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: In response to pro se's 9/27/2019 correspondence, we are enclosing a DKT 13 form this one time only. This court does not require this form, so same should be sent to the district court once completed [19-20642] (DLM) [Entered: 10/02/2019 02:45 PM]
October 2, 2019 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Raymond John Daniels to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [19-20642] (DLM) [Entered: 10/02/2019 02:41 PM]
September 16, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9145537-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 11/12/2019 for Appellant Raymond John Daniels [19-20642] (ABT) [Entered: 09/16/2019 03:16 PM]
September 11, 2019 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond John Daniels [19-20642] (CAS) [Entered: 09/11/2019 02:46 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raymond Daniels v. Lorie Davis, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HARRIS COUNTY JAIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BREANNA SCHWARTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HARRIS S. WOOD, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DONNA WRIGHT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PASADENA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LORIE DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RAYMOND JOHN DANIELS
Represented By: Raymond John Daniels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?