USA v. Muhammad Arif
MUHAMMAD ARIF |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-20662 |
September 17, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Jeremy Raymond Sanders for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 19-20662 [19-20662] (NFD) [Entered: 09/18/2019 12:59 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20662] (Jeremy Raymond Sanders ) [Entered: 09/17/2019 03:23 PM] |
DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Muhammad Arif [19-20662] (AS) [Entered: 09/17/2019 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Muhammad Arif | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: MUHAMMAD ARIF | |
Represented By: | Mohammed Obaid Shariff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Carmen Castillo Mitchell |
Represented By: | Jeremy Raymond Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.