Hamid Ihsan v. Weatherford US, L.P.
Defendant / Appellee: WEATHERFORD US, L.P.
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAMID IHSAN
Case Number: 19-20663
Filed: September 18, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 9, 2020 Hamid Ihsan v. Weatherford US, L.P.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Marrick Armstrong for Appellant Hamid Ihsan in 19-20663 [19-20663] (CAS) [Entered: 10/21/2019 04:05 PM]
October 21, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Marrick Armstrong for Mr. Hamid Ihsan for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20663] (Marrick Armstrong ) [Entered: 10/21/2019 09:20 AM]
October 7, 2019 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20663] (SDH) [Entered: 10/07/2019 03:43 PM]
October 7, 2019 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/18/2019 for Appellant Hamid Ihsan. [19-20663] (SDH) [Entered: 10/07/2019 03:44 PM]
October 1, 2019 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:17-CV-2546. Electronic ROA due on 10/16/2019. [19-20663] (ABT) [Entered: 10/01/2019 10:47 AM]
October 1, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Nehal Anand for Appellee Weatherford US, L.P. in 19-20663, Attorney Katherine Elizabeth Flanagan for Appellee Weatherford US, L.P. in 19-20663 [19-20663] (ABT) [Entered: 10/01/2019 10:46 AM]
October 1, 2019 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Hamid Ihsan advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-20663] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Hamid Ihsan advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 10/01/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Anand, Flanagan; Attorney for Appellant: Armstrong [19-20663] (Marrick Armstrong ) [Entered: 10/01/2019 09:53 AM]
September 30, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20663] (Katherine Elizabeth Flanagan ) [Entered: 09/30/2019 03:43 PM]
September 30, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20663] (Nehal Anand ) [Entered: 09/30/2019 03:49 PM]
September 25, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9152885-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 10/10/2019 for Appellant Hamid Ihsan [19-20663] (CAS) [Entered: 09/25/2019 02:04 PM]
September 18, 2019 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Hamid Ihsan [19-20663] (AS) [Entered: 09/18/2019 07:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hamid Ihsan v. Weatherford US, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WEATHERFORD US, L.P.
Represented By: Nehal Anand
Represented By: Katherine Elizabeth Flanagan Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HAMID IHSAN
Represented By: Marrick Armstrong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?