In re: Raul Trevino
Petitioner: In re: RAUL ADAME TREVINO
Case Number: 19-20702
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2019 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [19-20702] (CBW) [Entered: 10/07/2019 01:26 PM]
October 7, 2019 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Raul Adame Trevino for writ of mandamus [9161776-2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 10/04/2019. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 11/06/2019 for Petitioner Raul Adame Trevino. Date of Service: 10/01/2019 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Petition for writ of mandamus must include certificate of service. [19-20702] (CBW) [Entered: 10/07/2019 01:33 PM]
October 7, 2019 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Raul Adame Trevino to proceed in forma pauperis [9161785-2]. Date of service: 09/30/2019 [19-20702] (CBW) [Entered: 10/07/2019 01:39 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Raul Trevino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: RAUL ADAME TREVINO
Represented By: Raul Adame Trevino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?