Charles Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
| CHARLES DARNELL SMITH |
| LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
| 19-20759 |
| November 6, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20759] (CMB) [Entered: 12/12/2019 04:07 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/21/2019 denying COA for Appellant Mr. Charles Darnell Smith [19-20759] (CAG) [Entered: 12/06/2019 01:23 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9204921-2] Motion due on 01/15/2020 for Appellant Charles Darnell Smith. Brief in Support due on 01/15/2020 for Appellant Charles Darnell Smith [19-20759] (CAG) [Entered: 12/06/2019 01:24 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CV-2813. Electronic ROA due on 12/23/2019. [19-20759] (CAG) [Entered: 12/06/2019 01:26 PM] |
| LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: our Court is no longer monitoring for district court's ruling on a certificate of appealability pending further jurisdictional review of this appeal. [19-20759] (CAG) [Entered: 11/20/2019 10:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Susan Frances San Miguel for party(s) Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 19-20759 [19-20759] (CAG) [Entered: 11/15/2019 02:23 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20759] (Susan Frances San Miguel ) [Entered: 11/15/2019 05:54 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9186982-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Awaiting ruling on a certificate of appealability from the District Court. [19-20759] (CAG) [Entered: 11/11/2019 09:19 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion Requesting Leave for an Extension of Time to File a Pro Se Brief/Appendix, Etc. received from Appellant Mr. Charles Darnell Smith because there are no deadlines for the filing of an appellants brief, or any other filing at this time. [19-20759] (DLM) [Entered: 11/14/2019 10:54 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Darnell Smith [19-20759] (AS) [Entered: 11/06/2019 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Charles Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CHARLES DARNELL SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Charles Darnell Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Represented By: | Susan Frances San Miguel Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
