Kathy Coon v. CoreLogic, Incorporated, et al
| FNC, INCORPORATED and CORELOGIC, INCORPORATED |
| KATHY COON |
| 19-20813 |
| November 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Kathy Coon v. CoreLogic, Incorporated, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting in part Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Ms. Kathy Coon [ # 9229007-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 02/05/2020 for Appellant Kathy Coon [19-20813] (SDH) [Entered: 01/14/2020 03:47 PM] |
| OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Kathy Coon to extend time to file brief as appellant until 02/20/2020 [9229007-2]. Date of service: 01/13/2020 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Coane, Swiger; Attorney for Appellees: James, Neighbors [19-20813] (Matthew P. Swiger ) [Entered: 01/13/2020 05:51 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Bruce A. Coane for Appellant Kathy Coon in 19-20813 [19-20813] (CAS) [Entered: 12/13/2019 09:12 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Matthew P. Swiger for Appellant Kathy Coon in 19-20813 [19-20813] (CAS) [Entered: 12/13/2019 09:47 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Bruce A. Coane, Esq. for Ms. Kathy Coon for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20813] (Bruce A. Coane ) [Entered: 12/11/2019 02:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Matthew P. Swiger for Ms. Kathy Coon for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20813] (Matthew P. Swiger ) [Entered: 12/11/2019 02:32 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20813] (DDL) [Entered: 12/10/2019 10:04 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 01/21/2020 for Appellant Kathy Coon. [19-20813] (DDL) [Entered: 12/10/2019 10:05 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Allan Huddleston Neighbors for Appellee FNC, Incorporated in 19-20813, Attorney Allan Huddleston Neighbors for Appellee CoreLogic, Incorporated in 19-20813 [19-20813] (CAS) [Entered: 12/09/2019 11:23 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Chris James for party(s) Appellee FNC, Incorporated Appellee CoreLogic, Incorporated, in case 19-20813 [19-20813] (CAS) [Entered: 12/09/2019 11:27 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Allan Huddleston Neighbors, Esq. for CoreLogic, Incorporated and FNC, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20813] (Allan Huddleston Neighbors ) [Entered: 12/06/2019 11:08 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20813] (Chris James ) [Entered: 12/06/2019 11:11 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9203868-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-20813] (LLL) [Entered: 12/05/2019 01:31 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CV-2260. Electronic ROA due on 12/20/2019. [19-20813] (LLL) [Entered: 12/05/2019 01:44 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Kathy Coon advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [19-20813] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Kathy Coon advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 12/04/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Coane, Swiger; Attorney for Appellee: Neighbors [19-20813] (Matthew P. Swiger ) [Entered: 12/04/2019 03:00 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Kathy Coon [19-20813] (AS) [Entered: 11/26/2019 11:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.