Robbye Hannah v. Rhonda Thompson, et al
| RHONDA J. THOMPSON, Attorney for Geovera Specialty Insurance Company, GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, TERRY DONOHUE and EDWARD TREINEN |
| ROBBYE RENA HANNAH |
| 19-20863 |
| December 17, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Ms. Robbye Rena Hannah [ # 9238221-2 ] [19-20863] (SDH) [Entered: 01/27/2020 04:06 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Robbye Rena Hannah to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9238221-2]. Date of service: 01/22/2020 [19-20863] (SDH) [Entered: 01/27/2020 01:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Michael Wayne McCoy for Appellee GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company in 19-20863, Attorney Michael Wayne McCoy for Appellee Terry Donohue in 19-20863, Attorney Michael Wayne McCoy for Appellee Edward Treinen in 19-20863 [19-20863] (JMW) [Entered: 01/16/2020 07:11 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Seth Andrew Schmeeckle for party(s) Appellee GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company Appellee Edward Treinen Appellee Terry Donohue, in case 19-20863 [19-20863] (JMW) [Entered: 01/16/2020 07:14 AM] |
| LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: advising appellant that a motion to dismiss appeal must be filed if the appeal will no longer be pursued. [19-20863] (SDH) [Entered: 01/15/2020 11:45 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-20863] (Seth Andrew Schmeeckle ) [Entered: 01/15/2020 03:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Michael Wayne McCoy, Esq. for Mr. Terry Donohue, GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company and Mr. Edward Treinen for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-20863] (Michael Wayne McCoy ) [Entered: 01/15/2020 03:40 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/18/2020 for Appellant Robbye Rena Hannah. [19-20863] (DDL) [Entered: 01/08/2020 09:44 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-20863] (DDL) [Entered: 01/08/2020 09:42 AM] |
| FEE PAID by Appellant Ms. Robbye Rena Hannah. [19-20863] (ABT) [Entered: 01/02/2020 08:59 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:19-CV-2659. Electronic ROA due on 01/17/2020. [19-20863] (ABT) [Entered: 01/02/2020 09:32 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9220319-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-20863] (ABT) [Entered: 01/02/2020 09:01 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the letter advising that the case was remanded to state court and request for refund received from Appellant Ms. Robbye Rena Hannah because if appellant chooses to dismiss her case, a motion is required. Her request for a refund has been sent to billing. [19-20863] (ABT) [Entered: 01/02/2020 01:48 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Stay Pending Appeal received from Appellant Ms. Robbye Rena Hannah because DOC 37, motion to stay in district court pending [19-20863] (CAS) [Entered: 12/26/2019 03:17 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Stay with exhibits because DOC 37, motion to stay in the district court pending. [19-20863] (CAS) [Entered: 12/26/2019 03:07 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Robbye Rena Hannah [19-20863] (AS) [Entered: 12/17/2019 03:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
