Raymond Crochet v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al
| OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INCORPORATED and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY |
| RAYMOND CROCHET |
| 19-30026 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Raymond Crochet v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, e |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Timothy Daniels is designated as inactive in this case. (No appearance form on file name no listed on the brief) [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:22 PM] |
| Attorney David Wayne O'Quinn for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in 19-30026 returned to active status in this case. [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:16 PM] |
| Paper copies of Appellant Reply Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochet in 19-30026 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [19-30026] (SBS) [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:00 AM] |
| PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochet [ # 9053965-2 ] Date of service: 05/30/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Blankenship, Campbell, Daniels, Emmett, Johnson, O'Quinn, Saxon; Attorney for Appellant: Staub; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Javier; Attorney for Appellee: Rurka [19-30026] (Perry R. Staub Jr.) [Entered: 05/30/2019 09:20 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Reply Brief because the incorrect event was to file the reply brief [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 05/16/2019 03:49 PM] |
| SUFFICIENT APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied. Paper Copies of Brief due on 06/04/2019 for Appellant Raymond Crochet. [19-30026] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires corrections: The table of authorities are not included. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 0 Reply Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 05/30/2019 for Appellant Raymond Crochet. [19-30026] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED by Mr. Raymond Crochet. Date of service: 05/15/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Blankenship, Campbell, Daniels, Emmett, Johnson, O'Quinn, Saxon; Attorney for Appellant: Staub; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Javier; Attorney for Appellee: Rurka [19-30026] (Perry R. Staub Jr.) [Entered: 05/15/2019 11:52 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to file brief in excess pages not to exceed up to five(5) additional pages filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochet [ # 9046241-2 ] [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 05/07/2019 04:55 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochet to file brief in excess of the page limitations but not to exceed up to five (5) additional pages, if necessary pages [9046241-2]. Date of service: 05/06/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Blankenship, Campbell, Daniels, Emmett, Johnson, O'Quinn, Saxon; Attorney for Appellant: Staub; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Javier; Attorney for Appellee: Rurka [19-30026] (Perry R. Staub Jr.) [Entered: 05/06/2019 05:06 PM] |
| Paper copies of Appellee Brief filed by Appellee Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Incorporated in 19-30026 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [19-30026] (MRW) [Entered: 04/26/2019 01:37 PM] |
| APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied. Reply Brief due on 05/15/2019 for Appellant Raymond Crochet. Paper Copies of Brief due on 04/30/2019 for Appellees Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Incorporated. [19-30026] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Incorporated. Date of service: 04/24/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Blankenship, Campbell, Daniels, Emmett, Johnson, O'Quinn, Saxon; Attorney for Appellant: Staub; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Javier; Attorney for Appellee: Rurka [19-30026] (Matthew Alan Campbell ) [Entered: 04/24/2019 06:48 PM] |
| Paper copies of Record Excerpts [ # 9016573-2 ] received as sufficient. Sufficient Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due deadline satisfied. [19-30026] (SBS) [Entered: 04/01/2019 09:48 AM] |
| Paper copies of Record Excerpts filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochet in 19-30026 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes They require: cover should be durable white covers and tabs # of Copies Provided: 4. Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due deadline satisfied.. Sufficient Paper Copies of Record Excerpts Due on 04/01/2019 for Appellant Raymond Crochet. [19-30026] (MRW) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:30 PM] |
| Paper copies of Appellant Brief filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochet in 19-30026 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [19-30026] (MRW) [Entered: 03/28/2019 03:29 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 04/24/2019 for Appellees Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Incorporated. Paper Copies of Brief due on 04/01/2019 for Appellant Raymond Crochet. [19-30026] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Raymond Crochet. Date of service: 03/25/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Blankenship, Campbell, Daniels, Emmett, Johnson, O'Quinn, Saxon; Attorney for Appellant: Staub; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Javier; Attorney for Appellee: Rurka [19-30026] (Perry R. Staub Jr.) [Entered: 03/25/2019 10:04 PM] |
| RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due on 04/01/2019 for Appellant Raymond Crochet. [19-30026] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochet. Date of service: 03/25/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Blankenship, Campbell, Daniels, Emmett, Johnson, O'Quinn, Saxon; Attorney for Appellant: Staub; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Javier; Attorney for Appellee: Rurka [19-30026] (Perry R. Staub Jr.) [Entered: 03/25/2019 10:08 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/25/2019 for Appellant Raymond Crochet. [19-30026] (DDL) [Entered: 02/11/2019 02:41 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-30026] (DDL) [Entered: 02/11/2019 02:40 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) David Wayne O'Quinn for party(s) Appellee Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, in case 19-30026 [19-30026] (CB) [Entered: 02/05/2019 02:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-30026] (David Wayne O'Quinn ) [Entered: 02/04/2019 03:49 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:16-CV-36. Electronic ROA due on 02/15/2019. [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 08:15 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary No hearings- for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 08:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Saxon for party(s) Appellee Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Incorporated, in case 19-30026 [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 09:12 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew Alan Campbell for party(s) Appellee Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Incorporated, in case 19-30026 [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 09:10 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Perry R. Staub Jr. for Appellant Raymond Crochet in 19-30026 [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 09:14 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Robert Sartain Emmett for party(s) Appellee Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Incorporated, in case 19-30026 [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 09:27 AM] |
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Robert S. Emmett is designated as inactive in this case. Reason:Not representing party. [19-30026] (MAS) [Entered: 01/31/2019 09:26 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-30026] (Matthew Saxon ) [Entered: 01/29/2019 01:37 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-30026] (Matthew Alan Campbell ) [Entered: 01/29/2019 01:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Perry R. Staub, Jr. for Mr. Raymond Crochet for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-30026] (Perry R. Staub Jr.) [Entered: 01/29/2019 02:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Robert Sartain Emmett for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-30026] (Robert Sartain Emmett ) [Entered: 01/29/2019 05:08 PM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochetfor the Court to process. Date of service: 01/29/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Blankenship, Daniels, Emmett, Johnson; Attorney for Appellant: Staub; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Javier; Attorney for Appellee: Rurka. [19-30026] (Perry R. Staub Jr.) [Entered: 01/29/2019 03:00 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8962572-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 01/31/2019, for Appellant Raymond Crochet. [19-30026] (DLJ) [Entered: 01/16/2019 01:13 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Raymond Crochet [19-30026] (LEF) [Entered: 01/10/2019 09:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
