In re: Jimmy Frank
| In re: JIMMY LEE FRANK |
| 19-30086 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Rehear or Reconsider received from Movant Mr. Jimmy Lee Frank because 28 U.S.C. Section 2244 (b)(3)(E) does not permit review of the denial of te request to file a successive petition [19-30086] (MRW) [Entered: 03/19/2019 11:28 AM] |
| COURT ORDER denying Motion to file successive petition filed by Movant Mr. Jimmy Lee Frank [ # 8980232-2 ]. [19-30086] (MAS) [Entered: 02/19/2019 01:35 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Movant Mr. Jimmy Lee Frank for authorization to file successive petition 2255 petition[8980232-1] Date received in 5th Circuit: 02/08/2019.. [19-30086] (MRW) [Entered: 02/08/2019 02:01 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [19-30086] (MRW) [Entered: 02/08/2019 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Jimmy Frank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: JIMMY LEE FRANK | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy Lee Frank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
