Brandon LaVergne v. Michael Vaughn, et al
| BRUCE DODD and MICHAEL VAUGHN, Investigator Louisiana State Penitentiary |
| BRANDON S. LAVERGNE |
| 19-30272 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Brandon LaVergne v. Michael Vaughn, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Brandon S. LaVergne. Fee deadline satisfied [19-30272] (MRW) [Entered: 05/22/2019 02:22 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 07/01/2019 for Appellant Brandon S. LaVergne. [19-30272] (MRW) [Entered: 05/22/2019 02:25 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting in part, the motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Brandon S. LaVergne [ # 9050465-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 05/24/2019 for Appellant Brandon S. LaVergne [19-30272] (DLM) [Entered: 05/10/2019 04:18 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Brandon S. LaVergne to extend time to pay filing fee until 05/25/2019 [9050465-2]. [19-30272] (DLM) [Entered: 05/10/2019 04:17 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER to extend time to pay filing fee [9045281-2] Fee deadline updated to 05/15/2019 for Appellant Brandon S. LaVergne [19-30272] (MRW) [Entered: 05/06/2019 09:32 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9029237-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 04/30/2019 for Appellant Brandon S. LaVergne [19-30272] (SMC) [Entered: 04/15/2019 11:02 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Brandon S. LaVergne [19-30272] (SMC) [Entered: 04/09/2019 04:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
