R. Ceasar v. Oustalet Toyota, et al
| DARREN OUSTALET, S. MAURICE HICKS, JR. and OUSTALET TOYOTA |
| R. CEASAR |
| 19-30381 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9095388-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30381] (CCR) [Entered: 07/11/2019 01:45 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9090158-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. [9090158-1] [19-30381] (CCR) [Entered: 07/03/2019 11:09 AM] |
| UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [19-30381] (LEF) [Entered: 06/27/2019 02:35 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/14/2019 order striking the complaint and closing the case [19-30381] (LEF) [Entered: 06/27/2019 11:01 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for entry of judgment. [9077144-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30381] (LLL) [Entered: 06/17/2019 01:03 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9071455-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. [9071455-1] [19-30381] (LLL) [Entered: 06/10/2019 09:06 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process after monitoring for entry of judgment. [9056903-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [19-30381] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/20/2019 02:34 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar [19-30381] (WMJ) [Entered: 05/14/2019 01:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
