USA v. Tony Lam
TONY LAM |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-30387 |
May 15, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TRANSCRIPT ORDERS received from Appellant Mr. Tony Lam. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Karen Anderson Ibos, Proceeding Type and Date: Rearraignment 08/22/2018; Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Toni Doyle Tusa, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 12/12/2018. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 07/15/2019, for Karen Ibos, Court Reporter, and Toni Tusa, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed [ # 9090010-2 ]. [19-30387] (DLJ) [Entered: 07/03/2019 01:08 PM] |
ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Tony Lamfor the Court to process. Date of service: 07/03/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Boitmann, Copes, Shih; Attorney for Appellant: Kuhn. [19-30387] (Samantha Jean Kuhn ) [Entered: 07/03/2019 09:55 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Samantha Jean Kuhn for Appellant Tony Lam in 19-30387. [19-30387] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/20/2019 08:36 AM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/13/2019, appointing Samantha Kuhn as counsel for Appellant Tony Lam in 19-30387. Transcript order due on 07/05/2019, for Appellant Tony Lam. [19-30387] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/19/2019 02:52 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Samantha Jean Kuhn for Mr. Tony Lam for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-30387] (Samantha Jean Kuhn ) [Entered: 06/19/2019 03:14 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Diane Hollenshead Copes for Appellee USA, in case 19-30387. [19-30387] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/31/2019 08:09 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kevin G. Boitmann for Appellee USA, in case 19-30387. [19-30387] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/31/2019 08:07 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jonathan Leighton Shih for Appellee USA in 19-30387. [19-30387] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/31/2019 08:06 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jonathan Leighton Shih for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-30387] (Jonathan Leighton Shih ) [Entered: 05/29/2019 10:35 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-30387] (Kevin G. Boitmann ) [Entered: 05/29/2019 10:36 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-30387] (Diane Hollenshead Copes ) [Entered: 05/29/2019 10:37 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9056454-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. (appt csl). [19-30387] (LLL) [Entered: 05/20/2019 10:58 AM] |
DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Tony Lam [19-30387] (LLL) [Entered: 05/15/2019 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Tony Lam | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: TONY LAM | |
Represented By: | Tony Lam |
Represented By: | Samantha Jean Kuhn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Jonathan Leighton Shih |
Represented By: | Diane Hollenshead Copes Esq. |
Represented By: | Kevin G. Boitmann |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.