R. Ceasar v. Mr. Cash Pay Day Loans, et al
MR. CASH, Owner, MR. CASH PAY DAY LOANS, AMERICAN CASH ADVANCE PAY DAY LOANS, AMERICAN CASH ADVANCE, Owner and DELORES JOSEPH, Manager |
R. CEASAR |
19-30622 |
August 6, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the Caption does not match the case caption. Additionally the Brief requires The court name is not complete, the originating court name is missing, the type of brief, and the appellant name and address is missing on the cover of the brief. The following are missing Certificate of Interested Persons (with a signature after), Statement Regarding Oral Argument, Table of Contents, Table of Authorities, Statement of Jurisdiction, Statement of Issues, Statement of the Case, Summary of Argument, Standard of Review, Argument, Conclusion and no record citations. The brief cannot be hand written and attachments to the brief are not allowed. Record excerpts are required. 6 additional copies are needed. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 10/16/2019 for Appellant R. Ceasar. Sufficient Brief due on 10/16/2019 for Appellant R. Ceasar. [19-30622] (MCS) [Entered: 10/02/2019 09:27 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-30622] (DDL) [Entered: 09/12/2019 01:53 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/22/2019 for Appellant R. Ceasar. [19-30622] (DDL) [Entered: 09/12/2019 01:54 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9136525-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30622] (LLL) [Entered: 09/04/2019 11:23 AM] |
Financial Affidavit in Support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar in 19-30622 [ # 9125845-3 ] has been made sufficient. [19-30622] (MCS) [Entered: 09/04/2019 02:36 PM] |
CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9130623-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. [9130623-1] [19-30622] (LLL) [Entered: 08/27/2019 10:00 AM] |
SUFFICIENT AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS Appellant R. Ceasar in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar in 19-30622 [ # 9125845-3 ].. Miscellaneous deadline satisfied [19-30622] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar in 19-30622 [ # 9125845-3 ]. Affidavit is insufficient for the following reasons: Does not state issues on appeal. PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. [19-30622] (MCS) [Entered: 08/23/2019 03:18 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 5:19-CV-775. Electronic ROA due on 09/04/2019. [19-30622] (MCS) [Entered: 08/20/2019 03:04 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar to change venue to 7th District Chicago, IL [9125845-2], to proceed in forma pauperis. [9125845-3] Fee deadline canceled. [19-30622] (MCS) [Entered: 08/20/2019 03:03 PM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 08/13/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. Fee due on 09/13/2019 for Appellant R. Ceasar [19-30622] (MCS) [Entered: 08/14/2019 07:44 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9119068-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 08/27/2019 for Appellant R. Ceasar [19-30622] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/12/2019 11:59 AM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar [19-30622] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/06/2019 02:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.