Lee Jenkins v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY |
LEE ROY JENKINS |
19-30729 |
September 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [9160459-2] [19-30729] (MCS) [Entered: 10/04/2019 11:10 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9143197-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP due on 09/27/2019 for Appellant Lee Roy Jenkins. [19-30729] (RLL) [Entered: 09/12/2019 11:05 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Lee Roy Jenkins. [19-30729] (RLL) [Entered: 09/05/2019 09:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Lee Jenkins v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: LEE ROY JENKINS | |
Represented By: | Lee Roy Jenkins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.