Derrick Pierre v. Local Rule Policy Maker
Plaintiff / Appellant: DERRICK B. PIERRE
Defendant / Appellee: LOCAL RULE POLICY MAKER FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL
Case Number: 19-30738
Filed: September 6, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 10, 2020 Derrick Pierre v. Local Rule Policy Maker

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2019 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/16/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Derrick B. Pierre because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee or motion for IFP in 5CCA due on 11/15/2019 for Appellant Derrick B. Pierre [19-30738] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/16/2019 02:08 PM]
October 16, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9168501-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30738] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/16/2019 02:14 PM]
October 9, 2019 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9163731-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick B. Pierre. [9163731-1] [19-30738] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/09/2019 10:28 AM]
October 8, 2019 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Derrick B. Pierre. Fee deadline satisfied. [19-30738] (AGL) [Entered: 10/08/2019 12:24 PM]
September 27, 2019 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/27/2019 - Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, the plaintiff shall submit to this Court either $505.00 (the full amount of the applicable appellate filing fee) or a properly completed motion to proceed as a pauper on appeal pursuant to Rule 24(a) of the FRAP, together with a properly completed Statement of Account, signed by an authorized officer of the institution, certifying to the average six-month deposits and balance in the plaintiff's inmate account(s). [19-30738] (AGL) [Entered: 09/27/2019 09:03 AM]
September 16, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9145607-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30738] (CB) [Entered: 09/16/2019 03:38 PM]
September 11, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9141789-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 11/05/2019 for Appellant Derrick B. Pierre [19-30738] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/11/2019 08:47 AM]
September 11, 2019 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9142090-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick B. Pierre. [9142090-1] [19-30738] (Notice of Appeal filed on 9/6/19) (MCS) [Entered: 09/11/2019 11:28 AM]
September 6, 2019 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Derrick B. Pierre [19-30738] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/06/2019 09:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Derrick Pierre v. Local Rule Policy Maker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DERRICK B. PIERRE
Represented By: Derrick B. Pierre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LOCAL RULE POLICY MAKER FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?