R. Ceasar v. S. Hicks, et al
| S. MAURICE HICKS and ELIZABETH FOOTE |
| R. CEASAR |
| 19-30753 |
| September 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| COURT ORDER - On October 22, 2019, the clerk provided the appellant 10 days to correct deficiencies in his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed on October 18, 2019. The directed corrections were not made. On November 4, 2019, appellant filed a Motion to Compel Filing. That motion is also deficient. The appellant is provided 14 additional days to return sufficient motions. If the appellant fails to correct the deficiencies and return the motions within the provided time, the clerk is directed to strike both motions. Appellant is advised that the clerk will neither accept nor acknowledge any future filings that do not fully comply with the rules of this court. [ # 9185087-2 ] [19-30753] (AGL) [Entered: 11/08/2019 07:09 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9182505-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30753] (MCS) [Entered: 11/04/2019 03:36 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar to compel filing. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: motion is handwritten and does not include a certificate of compliance [19-30753] (AGL) [Entered: 11/07/2019 10:12 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9179145-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. [9179145-1] [19-30753] (MCS) [Entered: 10/30/2019 11:21 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process (add'l appeal). [9174392-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30753] (AGL) [Entered: 10/24/2019 08:24 AM] |
| AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar in 19-30753 [ # 9172394-2 ].. [19-30753] (AGL) [Entered: 10/22/2019 10:56 AM] |
| MOTION to proceed in accordance with 1914, 1915 Act filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar, construed as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis [9172394-2] Fee deadline canceled. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: motion cannot be hand written; missing certificate of compliance Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 11/01/2019 for Appellant R. Ceasar [19-30753] (AGL) [Entered: 10/22/2019 10:46 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9170367-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. [9170367-1] [19-30753] (WMJ) [Entered: 10/18/2019 11:51 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the financial affidavit received from Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar because a formal motion to proceed in forma pauperis must accompany the affidavit [19-30753] (AGL) [Entered: 10/04/2019 02:59 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the "Motion for Record Excerpts," which appears to be a request for the record, received from Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. The record on appeal has not yet been filed in this case. When it is, appellant may request a copy from the district court [19-30753] (AGL) [Entered: 09/26/2019 09:07 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 09/23/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. Fee or IFP to 5CCA due on 10/24/2019 for Appellant R. Ceasar [19-30753] (AGL) [Entered: 09/24/2019 10:31 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9145236-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 10/01/2019 for Appellant R. Ceasar [19-30753] (CB) [Entered: 09/16/2019 01:10 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. R. Ceasar. [19-30753] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/11/2019 01:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
