Carl Thymes v. AT&T Mobility Services, L.L.C., et al
| CARL GENE THYMES |
| SANS CHEVAUX INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, L.L.C., L'AUBERGE CASINO & HOTEL PINNACLE, CIA/FBI COINTELPRO and DOES, 2 thru 25 |
| 19-30760 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| COURT ORDER DISMISSED the appeal for want of jurisdiction. (IN DETAIL)[9163098-2]. [19-30760] (MAS) [Entered: 10/28/2019 10:16 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-30760] (CB) [Entered: 10/08/2019 02:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Leon H. Lee Jr. for party(s) Appellee AT&T Mobility Services, L.L.C., in case 19-30760 [19-30760] (MAS) [Entered: 10/07/2019 01:49 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-30760] (Leon H. Lee Jr.) [Entered: 10/07/2019 12:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) John Seth Troutman for party(s) Appellee Sans Chevaux Investments, L.L.C., in case 19-30760 [19-30760] (MAS) [Entered: 10/02/2019 10:17 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Involvement terminated for Appellees Sans Chevaux Investments, L.L.C. and CIA/FBI Cointelpro in 19-30760. Reason: duplicate parties. [19-30760] (CB) [Entered: 10/02/2019 10:12 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-30760] (John Seth Troutman ) [Entered: 09/25/2019 01:26 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Carl Gene Thymes [19-30760] (CB) [Entered: 09/13/2019 11:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
