Tabitha Ricks v. Friends of WWOZ, Incorporated, et al
| BEAU ROYSTER, Individually, ELIZABETH ARROYO UTTERBACK, Individually and FRIENDS OF WWOZ, INCORPORATED |
| TABITHA PEARL RICKS |
| 19-30884 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/30/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Tabitha Pearl Ricks. Fee or motion for IFP due on 12/16/2019 for Appellant Tabitha Pearl Ricks. [19-30884] (SEP) [Entered: 11/15/2019 01:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Benjamin Michael Chapman for Appellee Elizabeth Arroyo Utterback in 19-30884, Attorney Benjamin Michael Chapman for Appellee Beau Royster in 19-30884, Attorney Benjamin Michael Chapman for Appellee Friends of WWOZ, Incorporated in 19-30884. [19-30884] (SEP) [Entered: 11/13/2019 10:36 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Benjamin Michael Chapman, Esq. for Friends of WWOZ, Incorporated, Mr. Beau Royster and Ms. Elizabeth Arroyo Utterback for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-30884] (Benjamin Michael Chapman ) [Entered: 11/12/2019 12:50 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9179169-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Monitoring for District Court to enter a ruling on the pending motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (District Court document number 66, filed 10/23/2019). [19-30884] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/30/2019 11:29 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Tabitha Pearl Ricks. [19-30884] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/25/2019 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
