USA v. Eduardo Villanova-Anaya
Defendant / Appellant: EDUARDO VILLANOVA-ANAYA, also known as Eduardo Torres, also known as Plebe
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-40063
Filed: January 28, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 27, 2019 USA v. Eduardo Villanova-Anaya

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-40063] (DDL) [Entered: 02/26/2019 09:31 AM]
February 26, 2019 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/08/2019 for Appellant Eduardo Villanova-Anaya. [19-40063] (DDL) [Entered: 02/26/2019 09:32 AM]
February 19, 2019 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the transcript acknowledgment form received from (Rick Ridriquez) for Appellant Mr. Eduardo Villanova-Anaya because it is unnecessary. [19-40063] (CAS) [Entered: 02/18/2019 02:35 PM]
February 8, 2019 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 7:13-CR-1222-1. Electronic ROA due on 02/25/2019. [19-40063] (CAS) [Entered: 02/08/2019 03:33 PM]
February 8, 2019 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-40063] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Eduardo Villanova-Anaya advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 02/08/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Gassmann, Meyers; Attorney for Appellee: Mitchell; US mail - Attorney for Appellant: Villanova-Anaya [19-40063] (Marjorie A. Meyers ) [Entered: 02/08/2019 03:22 PM]
January 30, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kayla R. Gassmann for party(s) Appellant Eduardo Villanova-Anaya, in case 19-40063 [19-40063] (JMW) [Entered: 01/30/2019 12:36 PM]
January 29, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8971446-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 02/13/2019 for Appellant Eduardo Villanova-Anaya [19-40063] (LLL) [Entered: 01/29/2019 11:36 AM]
January 29, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-40063] (Kayla R. Gassmann ) [Entered: 01/29/2019 12:04 PM]
January 28, 2019 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Eduardo Villanova-Anaya [19-40063] (LLL) [Entered: 01/28/2019 02:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Eduardo Villanova-Anaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: EDUARDO VILLANOVA-ANAYA, also known as Eduardo Torres, also known as Plebe
Represented By: Kayla R. Gassmann
Represented By: Marjorie A. Meyers
Represented By: Eduardo Villanova-Anaya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Carmen Castillo Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?