Mason James v. Univ of Texas Medical Branch, et al
STEPHEN MARTIN, Nurse, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH and CECILIA OKOXE, Provider |
MASON JAMES |
19-40112 |
February 11, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Mason James. The Brief requires a signature; attachments to be removed. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. # of Copies Provided: 4 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Sufficient Brief due on 04/10/2019 for Appellant Mason James. [19-40112] (ABT) [Entered: 03/27/2019 01:50 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-40112] (DDL) [Entered: 03/18/2019 12:32 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 04/16/2019 for Appellant Mason James. [19-40112] (ABT) [Entered: 03/07/2019 02:35 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 9:18-CV-61. Electronic ROA due on 03/22/2019. [19-40112] (ABT) [Entered: 03/07/2019 02:34 PM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/27/2019 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Mason James. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [19-40112] (ABT) [Entered: 03/07/2019 02:33 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8986156-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [19-40112] (IFP pending in district court) (AGL) [Entered: 02/18/2019 02:41 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Mason James [19-40112] (ABT) [Entered: 02/11/2019 01:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.