Ronald Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director
| RONALD GRAIG SMITH |
| LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
| 19-40173 |
| March 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 6:18-CV-502. Electronic ROA due on 05/09/2019. [19-40173] (MRW) [Entered: 04/24/2019 10:23 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Graig Smith for certificate of appealability [9036027-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [19-40173] (MRW) [Entered: 04/24/2019 10:18 AM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Graig Smith in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9036027-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9036031-1] [19-40173] (MRW) [Entered: 04/24/2019 10:18 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Graig Smith to not have a magistrate but a 3 judge hearing in this case [9036036-2]. [19-40173] (MRW) [Entered: 04/24/2019 10:20 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Stay the 2254 in a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Etc. filed with the district court, but forwarded to this court for processing since the motion is captioned to this court on behela of Appellant Mr. Ronald Graig Smith, because it is unclear of the relief being sought. As a matter of clarification, this case is an appeal, case no. 19-40159 is the motion for authorization. [19-40173] (DLM) [Entered: 04/09/2019 09:50 AM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 05/06/2019 for Appellant Ronald Graig Smith. Brief in Support due on 05/06/2019 for Appellant Ronald Graig Smith [19-40173] (DLM) [Entered: 03/27/2019 03:40 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/27/2019 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Ronald Graig Smith. [19-40173] (DLM) [Entered: 03/27/2019 03:39 PM] |
| FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Ronald Graig Smith to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [19-40173] (MRW) [Entered: 03/25/2019 08:42 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8998632-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 03/22/2019 for Appellant Ronald Graig Smith [19-40173] (DMS) [Entered: 03/07/2019 07:31 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ronald Graig Smith [19-40173] (AS) [Entered: 03/01/2019 09:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ronald Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RONALD GRAIG SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Ronald Graig Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
| Represented By: | Craig William Cosper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
