Chester Staples v. Lorie Davis, Director
CHESTER ALAN STAPLES |
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION |
19-40231 |
March 15, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion for Extension of Time to pay the filing fee received from Appellant Mr. Chester Alan Staples because it is unnecessary. On 4/22/19 the filing fee payment was received. [19-40231] (DLM) [Entered: 05/06/2019 02:02 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-40231] (JMW) [Entered: 05/01/2019 02:24 PM] |
LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 06/03/2019 for Appellant Chester Alan Staples. Brief in Support due on 06/03/2019 for Appellant Chester Alan Staples [19-40231] (ABT) [Entered: 04/22/2019 03:04 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 6:16-CV-1041. Electronic ROA due on 05/07/2019. [19-40231] (ABT) [Entered: 04/22/2019 03:07 PM] |
FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Chester Alan Staples. Fee deadline satisfied [19-40231] (ABT) [Entered: 04/22/2019 02:54 PM] |
CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Chester Alan Staples [ # 9023450-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 05/08/2019 for Appellant Chester Alan Staples [19-40231] (MRW) [Entered: 04/05/2019 03:56 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Chester Alan Staples to extend time to pay filing fee until 05/08/2019 [9023450-2]. [19-40231] (MRW) [Entered: 04/05/2019 03:55 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Benjamin Graham Lancaster for Appellee Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 19-40231 [19-40231] (ABT) [Entered: 03/26/2019 10:52 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Benjamin Graham Lancaster for Ms. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40231] (Benjamin Graham Lancaster ) [Entered: 03/25/2019 09:39 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9011710-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 04/08/2019 for Appellant Chester Alan Staples [19-40231] (ABT) [Entered: 03/22/2019 10:44 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Chester Alan Staples [19-40231] (AS) [Entered: 03/15/2019 11:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Chester Staples v. Lorie Davis, Director | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: CHESTER ALAN STAPLES | |
Represented By: | Chester Alan Staples |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Graham Lancaster |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.