Billy Butler v. Young, et al
| R. CARRWAY, JOHN DOE, LONG, YOUNG, SERGEANT YOUNG and MEDICAL STAFF, Smith County Jail |
| BILLY RAY BUTLER |
| 19-40242 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/15/2019 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Billy Ray Butler because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. Fee due on 06/14/2019 for Appellant Billy Ray Butler. [19-40242] (SEP) [Entered: 05/17/2019 09:28 AM] |
| FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Billy Ray Butler to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [19-40242] (DLM) [Entered: 04/17/2019 10:04 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Ray Butler to appoint counsel [9031367-2]. Date of service: 04/09/2019 [19-40242] (DLM) [Entered: 04/17/2019 10:07 AM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Ray Butler referencing the motion to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Ray Butler in 19-40242 [ # 9031367-2 ]. [19-40242] (DLM) [Entered: 04/17/2019 10:14 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9015805-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 05/22/2019 for Appellant Billy Ray Butler [19-40242] (ABT) [Entered: 03/28/2019 08:31 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Ray Butler [19-40242] (AS) [Entered: 03/21/2019 08:16 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9010110-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Billy Ray Butler. [9010110-1] [19-40242] (AS) [Entered: 03/21/2019 08:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.