Brandon Richardson v. Brandon Belote, et al
| THADDEUS HUNT, SAQUED SALINAS, BRANDON BELOTE, REFUGIA CAMPOS, GARY CURRIE, WILLIAM STEPHENS, JUAN TREVINO, SONIA MORON, LANNETTE LINTHICUM, CAROLE MONROE, ALBERTO VALDEZ, DOVIE BUNCH, EILEEN KENNEDY and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| BRANDON RICHARDSON |
| 19-40282 |
| March 29, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-40282] (SEP) [Entered: 05/16/2019 08:18 AM] |
| BRIEFING SUSPENDED - the briefing notice was issued prematurely. There are transcripts that have not been ordered. A/Pet's Brief deadline canceled [19-40282] (ABT) [Entered: 05/15/2019 03:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Courtney Brooke Corbello for party(s) Appellee Sonia Moron Appellee Refugia Campos, in case 19-40282 [19-40282] (ABT) [Entered: 05/06/2019 12:49 PM] |
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Briana Webb is designated as inactive for Appellees Refugia Campos and Sonia Moron. Reason: inadvertently added at case opening. [19-40282] (CAG) [Entered: 05/06/2019 04:28 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Briana Marie Webb for Appellee Dovie Bunch in 19-40282, Attorney Briana Marie Webb for Appellee Alberto Valdez in 19-40282, Attorney Briana Marie Webb for Appellee Juan Trevino in 19-40282, Attorney Briana Marie Webb for Appellee Saqued Salinas in 19-40282, Attorney Briana Marie Webb for Appellee Thaddeus Hunt in 19-40282, Attorney Briana Marie Webb for Appellee Brandon Belote in 19-40282. [19-40282] (SEP) [Entered: 05/08/2019 07:29 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40282] (Courtney Brooke Corbello ) [Entered: 05/06/2019 10:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Briana Marie Webb for Mr. Brandon Belote, Mr. Dovie Bunch, Mr. Thaddeus Hunt, Mr. Saqued Salinas, Mr. Juan Trevino and Mr. Alberto Valdez for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40282] (Briana Marie Webb ) [Entered: 05/06/2019 05:20 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 2:14-CV-464. Electronic ROA due on 05/17/2019. [19-40282] (ABT) [Entered: 05/02/2019 08:12 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 06/11/2019 for Appellant Brandon Richardson. [19-40282] (ABT) [Entered: 05/02/2019 08:09 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/25/2019 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Brandon Richardson. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [19-40282] (ABT) [Entered: 05/02/2019 08:08 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the 4/14/19 correspondence received from Appellant Mr. Brandon Richardson advising of retliation and harrassment efforts experienced from within the prison officials. This Court has no direct authority over these assertions unless the actions have been brought before this court on appeal. [19-40282] (DLM) [Entered: 04/19/2019 02:35 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Brandon Richardson. Fee deadline satisfied. [19-40282] (AS) [Entered: 04/16/2019 02:22 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9022217-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 05/29/2019 for Appellant Brandon Richardson [19-40282] (CBW) [Entered: 04/04/2019 02:28 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Brandon Richardson [19-40282] (CBW) [Entered: 03/29/2019 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
