Don White v. Mark Duff, et al
| DON RAY WHITE |
| MARK DUFF and TODD HARRIS |
| 19-40294 |
| April 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-40294] (SEP) [Entered: 05/13/2019 10:25 AM] |
| The Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA filed by Appellant Mr. Don Ray White in 19-40294 [ # 9038204-2 ] has been made sufficient. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Rpl deadline satisfied. [19-40294] (DLM) [Entered: 05/13/2019 11:24 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 9:17-CV-207. Electronic ROA due on 05/13/2019. [19-40294] (DLM) [Entered: 04/26/2019 11:25 AM] |
| SUFFICIENT MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Don Ray White to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) UNDER CLAIM OF IMMINENT DANGER. [9038204-2] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 04/20/2019 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs an inmate trust fund statement. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 05/10/2019 for Appellant Don Ray White [19-40294] (DLM) [Entered: 04/26/2019 11:21 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9024502-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 04/23/2019 for Appellant Don Ray White [19-40294] (CSG) [Entered: 04/08/2019 03:20 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Don Ray White [19-40294] (CSG) [Entered: 04/03/2019 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.