Michael Anderson, et al v. Shelby Operating Company, et al
| SHELBY OPERATING COMPANY, THOMAS WOOLUM, ANN SIKES, SHELBY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT and TOM SIKES |
| MICHAEL RAY ANDERSON, c/o Estates of Mary Ann Brashear & Columbus Brashear, ETHEL POGUE, c/o Estate of Mary Ann Brashear & Columbus Brashear and ETHEL POGUE, c/o Estates of Mary Ann Brashear & Columbus Brashear |
| 19-40312 |
| April 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| COURT ORDER granting jurisdictional review to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction (IN DETAIL) [9047487-2]; denying as moot Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Ray Anderson [ # 9029914-2 ]. [19-40312] (ABT) [Entered: 05/13/2019 01:08 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-40312] (ABT) [Entered: 05/08/2019 07:59 AM] |
| AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Ray Anderson in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Ray Anderson in 19-40312 [ # 9029914-2 ]. [19-40312] (AS) [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:21 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Ray Anderson to proceed in forma pauperis [9029914-2]. [19-40312] (AS) [Entered: 04/15/2019 04:19 PM] |
| PARTY LIMIT CASE. (FOR A FULL LIST OF PARTIES FOR THIS APPEAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DOCKET SHEET.) [19-40312] (CBW) [Entered: 04/09/2019 08:09 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Michael Ray Anderson and Ms. Ethel Pogue [19-40312] (CBW) [Entered: 04/09/2019 08:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
