John Doe v. Charles Yackulic, et al
MARSHA LOUISE SHEPHARD, PA-C, TIM COSTELLO, LARRY WAGENER, JR., GARY E. WATTS, Medical Doctor, BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF TEXAS, UROOJ MANSOUR, Medical Doctor, FENELLA MAZUR, MEDICAL CITY DENTON HOSPITAL, MEGAN BRENNAN, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, KRISTINA MONTET and CHARLES F. YACKULIC, Medical Doctor |
JOHN DOE |
19-40462 |
May 15, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-40462] (CB) [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:32 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/15/2019 for Appellant John Doe. [19-40462] (CB) [Entered: 06/04/2019 09:32 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. John Doe advising transcript unnecessary - no hearings [19-40462] (ABT) [Entered: 05/31/2019 03:58 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Andrew Fairles MacRae for Appellee BlueCross BlueShield of Texas in 19-40462 [19-40462] (ABT) [Entered: 05/30/2019 07:09 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40462] (Andrew Fairles MacRae ) [Entered: 05/29/2019 08:56 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9057585-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-40462] (AS) [Entered: 05/21/2019 10:58 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 4:18-CV-84. Electronic ROA due on 06/05/2019. [19-40462] (AS) [Entered: 05/21/2019 11:02 AM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. John Doe [19-40462] (ABT) [Entered: 05/15/2019 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.