USA v. Hayden Ricks
| HAYDEN RICKS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-40719 |
| August 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Hayden Ricks. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Chris Hwang, Proceeding Type and Date: Initial Appearance 10/16/2018 ; Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Lori Ann Barnett, Proceeding Type and Date: Bench Trial 04/08/2019 ; Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Ruth Weese, Proceeding Type and Date: Sentencing 08/12/2019. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 09/03/2019 for Lori Barnett, Court Reporter, Chris Hwang and Ruth Weese, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9127653-2 ] [19-40719] (LLL) [Entered: 08/23/2019 10:06 AM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Mrs. Lori Ann Barnett. [19-40719] (Lori Ann Barnett ) [Entered: 08/23/2019 11:16 AM] |
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Court Reporter Lori Ann Barnett Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Lori Ann Barnett, Est. Completion Dt: 09/23/2019, Est. No.of Pgs: 200, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 08/23/2019, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 09/23/2019, Proceeding Type and Date: Bench Trial 04/08/2019. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 09/23/2019 for Lori Ann Barnett, Court Reporter [19-40719] (CCR) [Entered: 08/23/2019 03:38 PM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Hayden Ricksfor the Court to process. Date of service: 08/22/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Miller; Attorney for Appellant: Sherwood. [19-40719] (Gregory Don Sherwood ) [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:47 PM] |
| CJA APPOINTMENT for Attorney Mr. Gregory Don Sherwood, Esq. for Mr. Hayden Ricks. Counsel must use the eVoucher system to file the voucher at disposition of the case. Please see the attached document for further guidance. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: ETX ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 4:18-CR-197-1 DEFENDANT NUMBER: 1 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 08/19/2019 [19-40719] (CAG) [Entered: 08/20/2019 10:10 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 08/19/2019 appointing Gregory Sherwood as counsel for Appellant Hayden Ricks in 19-40719, terminating Attorney Frank Warren Henderson for Appellant Hayden Ricks in 19-40719. [19-40719] (CAG) [Entered: 08/19/2019 04:54 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9124856-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 09/03/2019 for Appellant Hayden Ricks [19-40719] (CAG) [Entered: 08/19/2019 04:55 PM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Hayden Ricks [19-40719] (CAS) [Entered: 08/16/2019 04:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Hayden Ricks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: HAYDEN RICKS | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Don Sherwood Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Marisa J. Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
