Todd Feemster v. P. Chapa, et al
| R BEARD, JR., Stevenson Unit, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, T. SALLES, Correction Officer, Stevenson Unit, C. TUPA, Medical Officer, Stevenson Unit, V. TIJERINA, Correction Officer, Stevenson Unit and V. MACIEL, Program Supervisor I, Stevenson Unit |
| TODD ALAN FEEMSTER |
| 19-40815 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Todd Alan Feemster to appoint counsel [9192668-2]. Date of service: 11/14/2019 [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 11/19/2019 11:19 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jeanine Marie Coggeshall for Appellee C. Tupa in 19-40815 [19-40815] (JMW) [Entered: 11/19/2019 08:06 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Jeanine Marie Coggeshall for Mr. C. Tupa for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40815] (Jeanine Marie Coggeshall ) [Entered: 11/18/2019 11:56 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief received from Appellant Mr. Todd Alan Feemster because it crossed in the mail with the court's notice of 11/8/19 which advised that an extension of time had been allowed until 12/17/19 to file the brief (advised in MOT 1 ntc.) [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 11/19/2019 11:29 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/01/2019 denying as moot. a series of outstanding motions including a second motion for IFP. [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 11/08/2019 10:44 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER denying motion to stay further proceedings in this court filed by Appellant Mr. Todd Alan Feemster [ # 9186247-2 ]; sua sponte granting extension of time to file brief as appellant until 12/27/2019. [9186567-2] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 12/27/2019 for Appellant Todd Alan Feemster [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 11/08/2019 01:50 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 6:17-CV-39. Electronic ROA due on 11/25/2019. [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 11/08/2019 10:41 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9186206-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-40815] (JMW) [Entered: 11/08/2019 10:17 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Todd Alan Feemster to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: pending receipt of the record. Date of service: 10/31/2019 [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 11/08/2019 10:34 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9182086-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Todd Alan Feemster. [9182086-1] [19-40815] (AS) [Entered: 11/04/2019 11:31 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 11/26/2019 for Appellant Todd Alan Feemster. [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 10/17/2019 08:28 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/08/2019 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Todd Alan Feemster. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 10/11/2019 10:51 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Correspondence with an inmate trust fund account statement received from Appellant Mr. Todd Alan Feemster because it is unecessary. On 10/8/19, the district court granted IFP. [19-40815] (DLM) [Entered: 10/11/2019 10:57 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9158842-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [19-40815] IFP (JMW) [Entered: 10/02/2019 03:05 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Todd Alan Feemster [19-40815] (AS) [Entered: 09/27/2019 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
