Pamela Margolis v. James B. Nutter & Company, et al
| JAMES B. NUTTER & COMPANY and BENJAMIN S. CARSON, SR., SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT |
| PAMELA ZIOLKOWSKI MARGOLIS |
| 19-40889 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Pamela Margolis v. James B. Nutter & Company, et a |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Ms. Pamela Ziolkowski Margolis. Extension Granted to and including 01/09/2020. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 01/09/2020 for Appellant Pamela Ziolkowski Margolis [19-40889] (SB) [Entered: 11/26/2019 12:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Samuel P. Bragg for party(s) Appellee James B. Nutter & Company, in case 19-40889 [19-40889] (CB) [Entered: 11/15/2019 07:34 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Chad Wesley Cowan for Appellee Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in 19-40889 [19-40889] (CB) [Entered: 11/15/2019 07:33 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-40889] (Samuel P. Bragg ) [Entered: 11/13/2019 04:10 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Chad Wesley Cowan for Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40889] (Chad Wesley Cowan ) [Entered: 11/12/2019 03:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jared Michael Slade for Appellee James B. Nutter & Company in 19-40889 [19-40889] (CAG) [Entered: 11/08/2019 01:17 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jared Michael Slade for James B. Nutter & Company for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40889] (Jared Michael Slade ) [Entered: 11/07/2019 03:45 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/10/2019 for Appellant Pamela Ziolkowski Margolis. [19-40889] (DDL) [Entered: 10/31/2019 10:34 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-40889] (DDL) [Entered: 10/31/2019 10:33 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Dennis M. Sanchez for Appellant Pamela Ziolkowski Margolis in 19-40889 [19-40889] (CAG) [Entered: 10/29/2019 01:20 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:18-CV-162. Electronic ROA due on 11/13/2019. [19-40889] (CAG) [Entered: 10/29/2019 08:30 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Dennis M. Sanchez for Ms. Pamela Ziolkowski Margolis for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-40889] (Dennis M. Sanchez ) [Entered: 10/28/2019 09:48 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-40889] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Pamela Ziolkowski Margolis advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 10/28/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Cowan; Attorney for Appellant: Sanchez; US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Slade [19-40889] (Dennis M. Sanchez ) [Entered: 10/28/2019 09:53 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9174336-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 11/08/2019 for Appellant Pamela Ziolkowski Margolis [19-40889] (JMW) [Entered: 10/24/2019 07:34 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Pamela Ziolkowski Margolis [19-40889] (AS) [Entered: 10/21/2019 09:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
