USA v. Raul Fournier-Robles
| RAUL LEONEL FOURNIER-ROBLES, also known as Raul Leonel Fournier |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-50029 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50029] (DDL) [Entered: 03/12/2019 08:01 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 04/22/2019 for Appellant Raul Leonel Fournier-Robles. [19-50029] (DDL) [Entered: 03/12/2019 08:02 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 3:10-CR-1563-3. Electronic ROA due on 03/08/2019. [19-50029] (PAC) [Entered: 02/21/2019 11:52 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-50029] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Raul Leonel Fournier-Robles advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 02/21/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Gay; Attorney for Appellant: Lopez [19-50029] (Louis Elias Lopez Jr.) [Entered: 02/21/2019 11:35 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Transcript order form received from Appellant Mr. Raul Leonel Fournier-Robles because it should be electronically filed [19-50029] (MBC) [Entered: 02/15/2019 04:27 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Attorney Mr. Louis Elias Lopez, Jr., Esq. for Appellant Mr. Raul Leonel Fournier-Robles [8978247-1] to the Show Cause Order for failure to order transcript and make financial arrangements with court reporter [ # 8976591-2 ] Date of Service: 02/06/2019. [19-50029] (Louis Elias Lopez Jr.) [Entered: 02/06/2019 01:42 PM] |
| SHOW CAUSE ORDER issued to Mr. Louis Elias Lopez, Jr., Esq. for Mr. Raul Leonel Fournier-Robles for failure to order transcript and make financial arrangements with court reporter[8976591-2] Transcript Order deadline updated to 02/20/2019 for Appellant Raul Leonel Fournier-Robles. [19-50029] (MBC) [Entered: 02/05/2019 08:14 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8961384-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 01/30/2019 for Appellant Raul Leonel Fournier-Robles [19-50029] (CB) [Entered: 01/15/2019 01:16 PM] |
| NON-DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Raul Leonel Fournier-Robles [19-50029] (MFY) [Entered: 01/14/2019 02:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Raul Fournier-Robles | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: RAUL LEONEL FOURNIER-ROBLES, also known as Raul Leonel Fournier | |
| Represented By: | Louis Elias Lopez Esq. Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H. Gay Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
