Daniel Ostrander v. Christopher Lindsey, et al
LIEUTENANT HUGHES UNIT DANIEL PARKER, ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, WARDEN JOHN WERNER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER LINDSEY, WARDEN DAVID BLACKWELL, MAJOR HUGHES UNIT ANTHONY PATRICKS, ENRIQUE MONTENEGRO, HAROLD KOSTECK, MICHAEL WILLIAMS, SERGEANT/ SUPERVISOR MICHAEL KLUCK, NOTARY BRITTNEY STAR HAMILTON and WARDEN BRUCE ARMSTRONG |
DANIEL OSTRANDER |
19-50032 |
January 15, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Ostrander [ # 8982976-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 03/11/2019 for Appellant Daniel Ostrander [19-50032] (CNF) [Entered: 02/13/2019 09:17 AM] |
MOTION (DECLARATION-PROCESSING FILING FEE) filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Ostrander to extend time to pay filing fee [8982976-2]. Date of service: 01/30/2019 [19-50032] (CNF) [Entered: 02/13/2019 09:00 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Benjamin Lindberg Dower for Appellee Christopher Lindsey in 19-50032 [19-50032] (RAJ) [Entered: 02/05/2019 09:00 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Benjamin Lindberg Dower for Mr. Christopher Lindsey for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50032] (Benjamin Lindberg Dower ) [Entered: 02/01/2019 02:30 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8967174-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 02/07/2019 for Appellant Daniel Ostrander. [19-50032] (RLL) [Entered: 01/23/2019 12:24 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel Ostrander [19-50032] (NFD) [Entered: 01/15/2019 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.