Carol Morris v. Jeffrey Walls, et al
| TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Gatesville, TX, CITY OF MIDLAND, Midland, Texas, JEFFREY WALLS, U.S. Solicitor General - U.S. Department of Justice and ROBERT JUNELL, Senior United States District Judge |
| CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS |
| 19-50078 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to comply with the Court's notice of 02/01/2019 [19-50078] (MVM) [Entered: 03/06/2019 03:04 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion for relief from judgment (60(b)) received from Appellant Ms. Carol Johnene Morris. Filings in this court are governed strictly by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, NOT the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [19-50078] (CNF) [Entered: 03/04/2019 02:25 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to proceed IFP received from Appellant Ms. Carol Johnene Morris in light of the monetary sanctions imposed [19-50078] (CNF) [Entered: 02/12/2019 08:21 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [8974623-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 03/04/2019 for Appellant Carol Johnene Morris (sanction due) [19-50078] (ABT) [Entered: 02/01/2019 09:39 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Carol Johnene Morris [19-50078] (SDH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 04:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
