In re: Michael Lujan
In re: MICHAEL LEE LUJAN |
19-50176 |
March 1, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER granting Motion extend time to comply with Epps letter filed by Movant Michael Lee Lujan [ # 9019828-2 ] Motion due deadline updated to 05/01/2019 for Movant Michael Lee Lujan [19-50176] (CNF) [Entered: 04/02/2019 01:12 PM] |
MOTION filed by Movant Michael Lee Lujan to extend time to comply with Epps letter [9019828-2]. [19-50176] (CNF) [Entered: 04/02/2019 01:11 PM] |
LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: to advise movant the Motion pursuant to Fed Rules of Civil Proc 36 was not filed as a Notice of Appeal but construed as a successive motion. [19-50176] (CNF) [Entered: 03/14/2019 03:13 PM] |
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 02/27/2019 transferring successive 2255 petition to this court. Date received in 5th Circuit: 03/01/2019. Motion due on 04/01/2019 for Movant Michael Lee Lujan [19-50176] (MVM) [Entered: 03/01/2019 11:43 AM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [19-50176] (MVM) [Entered: 03/01/2019 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Michael Lujan | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL LEE LUJAN | |
Represented By: | Michael Lee Lujan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.