Francis Rozelle, Jr., et al v. Patrick Autry
| PATRICK HOLDER AUTRY |
| CLARITA SOMMERS JOHNSON and FRANCIS MCQUEEN ROZELLE, JR. |
| 19-50346 |
| April 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Patrick Holder Autry for Appellee Patrick Holder Autry in 19-50346 [19-50346] (MRW) [Entered: 05/30/2019 09:37 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50346] (Patrick Holder Autry ) [Entered: 05/28/2019 04:18 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [19-50346] (MFY) [Entered: 05/28/2019 03:23 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 5:17-CV-1237. Electronic ROA due on 06/07/2019. [19-50346] (MBC) [Entered: 05/23/2019 08:14 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-50346] (received phone call from appellant - also sending letter advising same) (MBC) [Entered: 05/23/2019 08:13 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9043832-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 05/17/2019 for Appellants Clarita Sommers Johnson and Francis McQueen Rozelle Jr. [19-50346] (CCR) [Entered: 05/02/2019 03:35 PM] |
| BANKRUPTCY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Clarita Sommers Johnson and Mr. Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr. [19-50346] (CCR) [Entered: 04/23/2019 12:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
