USA v. William Gonzalez-Ramirez
WILLIAM GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-50372 |
May 1, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
COURT ORDER granting Motion to stay further proceedings in this court filed by Appellant Mr. William Gonzalez-Ramirez [ # 9081979-2 ] [19-50372] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/25/2019 01:40 PM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. William Gonzalez-Ramirez to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: pending a decision in US v Pedroza-Rocha, 18-50828. [19-50372] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. William Gonzalez-Ramirez to suspend briefing notice dated 05/23/2019 [9081979-2]. Date of service: 06/21/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Bogan, Franco, Madewell; Attorney for Appellee: Gay [19-50372] (Bradford W. Bogan ) [Entered: 06/21/2019 06:47 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50372] (Bradford W. Bogan ) [Entered: 06/07/2019 10:24 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bradford W. Bogan for party(s) Appellant William Gonzalez-Ramirez, in case 19-50372 (RAJ) [Entered: 06/07/2019 11:48 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/02/2019 for Appellant William Gonzalez-Ramirez. [19-50372] (RLL) [Entered: 05/23/2019 03:52 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50372] (RLL) [Entered: 05/23/2019 03:52 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Judy Fulmer Madewell for party(s) Appellant William Gonzalez-Ramirez, in case 19-50372 [19-50372] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/09/2019 03:00 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50372] (Judy Fulmer Madewell ) [Entered: 05/09/2019 12:21 PM] |
ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. William Gonzalez-Ramirezfor the Court to process. Date of service: 05/03/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Franco; Attorney for Appellee: Gay. [19-50372] (Maureen Scott Franco ) [Entered: 05/03/2019 11:08 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:17-CR-58-1. Electronic ROA due on 05/20/2019. [19-50372] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/03/2019 12:19 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9043535-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 05/17/2019 for Appellant William Gonzalez-Ramirez [19-50372] (RAJ) [Entered: 05/02/2019 01:48 PM] |
DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. William Gonzalez-Ramirez [19-50372] (CMB) [Entered: 05/01/2019 07:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. William Gonzalez-Ramirez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: WILLIAM GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ | |
Represented By: | Maureen Scott Franco |
Represented By: | Bradford W. Bogan |
Represented By: | Judy Fulmer Madewell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Joseph H. Gay Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.