T. Guajardo v. State Bar of Texas, et al
SCOTT BALES, Chief Justice, In his Official Capacity, STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA SUPREME COURT and STATE BAR OF TEXAS |
T. ANTHONY GUAJARDO and THOMAS ANTHONY GUAJARDO |
19-50477 |
May 24, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
T. Guajardo v. State Bar of Texas, et al |
T. Guajardo v. State Bar of Texas, et al |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION to extend time to file brief as appellant until 09/09/2019 [9101912-2]. Date of service: 07/19/2019 [19-50477] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. Thomas Anthony Guajardo for filing Appellant's Opening Brief until 08/29/2019 [19-50477] (Thomas Anthony Guajardo ) [Entered: 07/19/2019 02:38 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Matthew James Greer for party(s) Appellee State Bar of Texas, in case 19-50477 [19-50477] (MRW) [Entered: 07/10/2019 12:46 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50477] (Matthew James Greer ) [Entered: 07/09/2019 03:16 PM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant T. Anthony Guajardo for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9086557-2]. Date of service: 06/25/2019 [19-50477] (MBC) [Entered: 06/28/2019 10:59 AM] |
CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant T. Anthony Guajardo [ # 9086557-2 ] [19-50477] (MBC) [Entered: 06/28/2019 11:04 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Wendy J. Harrison for party(s) Appellee State of Arizona Appellee Scott Bales Appellee Arizona Supreme Court, in case 19-50477 [19-50477] (CMB) [Entered: 06/19/2019 08:17 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50477] (CB) [Entered: 06/19/2019 10:14 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/29/2019 for Appellant T. Anthony Guajardo. [19-50477] (CB) [Entered: 06/19/2019 10:15 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Lisa T. Hauser for Appellee State Bar of Arizona in 19-50477 [19-50477] (CMB) [Entered: 06/18/2019 02:04 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50477] (Wendy J. Harrison ) [Entered: 06/17/2019 06:18 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Lisa T. Hauser for State Bar of Arizona for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50477] (Lisa T. Hauser ) [Entered: 06/17/2019 01:22 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant T. Anthony Guajardo for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9076749-2]. Date of service: 06/12/2019 [19-50477] (MBC) [Entered: 06/17/2019 09:28 AM] |
CLERK ORDER denying Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant T. Anthony Guajardo [ # 9076749-2 ] [19-50477] (MBC) [Entered: 06/17/2019 01:46 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Paul H. Homburg, III for State Bar of Texas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50477] (Paul H. Homburg III) [Entered: 06/10/2019 11:36 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Paul H. Homburg III for Appellee State Bar of Texas in 19-50477 [19-50477] (CMB) [Entered: 06/10/2019 12:49 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9066550-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [19-50477] (CBW) [Entered: 06/03/2019 02:16 PM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 5:18-CV-1320. Electronic ROA due on 06/18/2019. [19-50477] (CBW) [Entered: 06/03/2019 02:23 PM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant T. Anthony Guajardo [19-50477] (CBW) [Entered: 05/24/2019 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.