Benny Daneshjou v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENNY DANESHJOU
Defendant / Appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Case Number: 19-50503
Filed: June 3, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 2, 2020 Benny Daneshjou v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/12/2019 for Appellant Benny Daneshjou. [19-50503] (DDL) [Entered: 07/01/2019 07:33 AM]
July 1, 2019 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50503] (DDL) [Entered: 07/01/2019 07:33 AM]
June 27, 2019 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:18-CV-688. Electronic ROA due on 07/12/2019. [19-50503] (MVM) [Entered: 06/27/2019 11:26 AM]
June 27, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney William D. Davis for Appellant Benny Daneshjou in 19-50503 [19-50503] (CBW) [Entered: 06/27/2019 01:57 PM]
June 26, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. William D. Davis for Mr. Benny Daneshjou for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50503] (William D. Davis ) [Entered: 06/26/2019 08:42 PM]
June 26, 2019 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Benny Daneshjou advising transcript unnecessary Date of Service: 06/26/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Davis; Attorney for Appellees: Lewis, Schout, Sudbury [19-50503] (William D. Davis ) [Entered: 06/26/2019 08:34 PM]
June 10, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Marcie Lynn Schout for party(s) Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in case 19-50503 [19-50503] (SDH) [Entered: 06/10/2019 12:59 PM]
June 10, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50503] (Marcie Lynn Schout ) [Entered: 06/10/2019 10:12 AM]
June 10, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [19-50503] (William Lance Lewis ) [Entered: 06/10/2019 10:22 AM]
June 10, 2019 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William Lance Lewis for party(s) Appellee JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in case 19-50503 [19-50503] (SDH) [Entered: 06/10/2019 12:58 PM]
June 7, 2019 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9070540-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 06/24/2019 for Appellant Benny Daneshjou [19-50503] (LLL) [Entered: 06/07/2019 10:40 AM]
June 3, 2019 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Benny Daneshjou [19-50503] (CCR) [Entered: 06/03/2019 03:36 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Benny Daneshjou v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BENNY DANESHJOU
Represented By: William D. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Represented By: Gregory Marshall Sudbury Esq.
Represented By: Marcie Lynn Schout Esq.
Represented By: William Lance Lewis Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?