Sara Hoke, et al v. Robert Anderson, et al
| CELESTINE ADAMS, SETH MODEL, QUINT SEBEK, ROBERT ANDERSON, LEWIS HOLLAND and JON BUNDICK |
| AMANDA HOKE and SARA HOKE |
| 19-50602 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Sara Hoke, et al v. Robert Anderson, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Millie Leone Thompson, Esq. for Ms. Amanda Hoke and Ms. Sara Hoke for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50602] (Millie Leone Thompson ) [Entered: 08/29/2019 02:23 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Amanda Hoke and Ms. Sara Hoke. Date of service: 08/29/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Birring; Attorney for Appellant: Thompson [19-50602] (Millie Leone Thompson ) [Entered: 08/29/2019 02:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Millie Leone Thompson for Appellant Amanda Hoke in 19-50602, Attorney Millie Leone Thompson for Appellant Sara Hoke in 19-50602 [19-50602] (WMJ) [Entered: 08/29/2019 04:24 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellants Ms. Amanda Hoke and Ms. Sara Hoke for filing Motion to Extend Time to File Appellants' Brief until 08/30/2019 [19-50602] (Millie Leone Thompson ) [Entered: 08/26/2019 09:28 AM] |
| EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Ms. Amanda Hoke and Ms. Sara Hoke. Extension Granted to and including 08/30/2019. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 08/30/2019 for Appellants Amanda Hoke and Sara Hoke [19-50602] (LEF) [Entered: 08/26/2019 10:29 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Sameer Singh Birring for Appellee Celestine Adams in 19-50602, Attorney Sameer Singh Birring for Appellee Quint Sebek in 19-50602, Attorney Sameer Singh Birring for Appellee Jon Bundick in 19-50602, Attorney Sameer Singh Birring for Appellee Seth Model in 19-50602, Attorney Sameer Singh Birring for Appellee Lewis Holland in 19-50602, Attorney Sameer Singh Birring for Appellee Robert Anderson in 19-50602 [19-50602] (CB) [Entered: 07/22/2019 03:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Sameer Singh Birring for Ms. Celestine Adams, Mr. Robert Anderson, Mr. Jon Bundick, Mr. Lewis Holland, Mr. Seth Model and Mr. Quint Sebek for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [19-50602] (Sameer Singh Birring ) [Entered: 07/22/2019 12:19 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 1:18-CV-232. Electronic ROA due on 07/31/2019. [19-50602] (CB) [Entered: 07/16/2019 08:05 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [19-50602] (CB) [Entered: 07/16/2019 12:59 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/26/2019 for Appellants Amanda Hoke and Sara Hoke. [19-50602] (CB) [Entered: 07/16/2019 12:59 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [19-50602] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Ms. Amanda Hoke and Ms. Sara Hoke advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 07/15/2019 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Birring; Attorney for Appellant: Thompson [19-50602] (Millie Leone Thompson ) [Entered: 07/15/2019 05:05 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete, Action: Case OK to Process. [9093124-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 07/24/2019 for Appellants Amanda Hoke and Sara Hoke [19-50602] (LLL) [Entered: 07/09/2019 11:05 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Amanda Hoke and Ms. Sara Hoke [19-50602] (LLL) [Entered: 07/01/2019 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
